Feed aggregator

Intel Sends Out Initial Graphics Driver Patches For Multi-Device SVM  Phoronix

Jika kamu penggemar slot online, pasti sudah tidak asing lagi dengan Gates of Olympus, salah satu permainan paling legendaris dari Pragmatic Play. Di balik tampilan megah sang dewa petir Zeus, tersembunyi kesempatan menang besar yang bisa meledak kapan saja. Menariknya, di PETATOTO, kamu bisa mencoba demo slot Gates of Olympus tanpa modal — cara paling aman untuk belajar memecahkan petir Zeus sebelum bermain dengan uang asli.

Review Lengkap Demo Slot Gates of Olympus di PETATOTO

Slot ini menghadirkan tema mitologi Yunani dengan Zeus sebagai simbol utama. PETATOTO menyediakan versi demo Gates of Olympus yang identik dengan versi aslinya, termasuk simbol, RTP, volatilitas tinggi, dan fitur pengali petir (Multiplier Lightning).

Baca Juga : asustoto 10 Slot Demo Pragmatic Gacor 2025 — Scatter Beruntun!

Kelebihan utama dari demo slot Zeus PETA TOTO adalah:

• Tidak perlu login dengan saldo asli.
• Bisa diuji tanpa risiko kehilangan uang.
• Menampilkan pola asli RTP dan timing petir.

Cara Kerja Slot Gates of Olympus

Gameplay-nya sederhana tapi menegangkan. Pemain cukup menekan tombol spin dan menunggu kombinasi simbol muncul. Fitur “Tumble” akan menggantikan simbol yang menang dengan simbol baru, menciptakan peluang kombo beruntun. Saat Zeus mengangkat tangan dan petir menyambar, multiplier mulai bekerja — inilah momen paling ditunggu.

Data Penting Gates of Olympus

• Provider: Pragmatic Play
• RTP (Return to Player): ±96.5%
• Volatilitas: Tinggi
• Simbol Spesial: Scatter (Zeus), Multiplier Lightning
• Maksimal Kemenangan: Hingga x5000

Strategi Pecahkan Petir Zeus di Demo Slot PETATOTO

Main demo Gates of Olympus PETA TOTO bukan hanya hiburan, tapi juga latihan strategi sebelum bermain sungguhan. Dengan RTP tinggi dan volatilitas besar, kamu perlu memahami ritme permainan.

Tips Rahasia dari Pemain Berpengalaman

Berdasarkan pengalaman banyak pemain, ada beberapa pola bermain yang sering memicu petir besar di slot demo Zeus:

1. Main bertahap, bukan auto-spin.
   Zeus sering “memanaskan” dulu sebelum petir muncul. Main manual di awal bisa bantu baca pola.

2. Perhatikan tanda petir kecil.
   Biasanya petir kecil adalah pertanda petir besar akan datang.

3. Gunakan mode demo untuk uji timing.
   Di PETATOTO, kamu bisa reset demo tanpa batas — cocok buat cari jam gacor.

Jam Gacor Gates of Olympus (berdasarkan pola pemain)

• Pagi (06.00–09.00): Petir sering muncul lebih cepat.
• Malam (21.00–01.00): Kombinasi multiplier besar x100 lebih sering terlihat.
• Hari Minggu: RTP terasa lebih stabil, cocok buat sesi panjang.

Mengapa Harus Coba Demo Slot Zeus di PETATOTO?

Selain gratis, PETA TOTO terkenal sebagai platform slot demo dengan performa stabil dan tampilan realistis. Banyak pemain menggunakannya untuk menganalisis pola Gates demo sebelum terjun ke mode uang asli.

Kelebihan Bermain di PETATOTO

• Grafik & suara sama seperti versi asli.
• Tanpa iklan & bebas lag.
• Bisa dimainkan di HP dan PC.

Selain itu, situs ini juga menyediakan banyak pilihan slot demo lain, seperti Sweet Bonanza, Starlight Princess, dan Aztec Gems, untuk memperluas strategi bermainmu.

Pola Gacor Gates of Olympus Versi Demo

Banyak pemain percaya bahwa slot demo PETA TOTO bisa membantu menemukan pola petir gacor yang mirip versi real RTP. Berikut beberapa pola yang sering disebut paling stabil.

Baca Juga : isitoto Slot Demo Gratis RTP Tinggi: Latihan Menang Tiap Hari

Pola 15 Spin Manual

• Putar manual 10x tanpa turbo.
• Lanjutkan 5x dengan turbo mode.
• Jika muncul multiplier kecil (x2–x5), lanjutkan lagi 10 spin. Biasanya multiplier besar x50 atau lebih muncul setelahnya.

Pola Auto Turbo 30 Spin

• Gunakan auto-spin 30x dengan bet konstan.
• Hentikan jika 3 kali tidak muncul scatter.
• Ulangi setelah 5 menit jeda.

Contoh Pola Kemenangan

Seorang pemain demo di PETA TOTO melaporkan:

“Petir x250 muncul setelah 22 spin di pagi hari. Setelah saya ulang, muncul lagi di spin ke-25.”
Artinya, pola waktu dan ritme spin bisa sangat menentukan.

Tips Main Aman dan Efektif di Demo Gates of Olympus

Meski hanya demo, mindset bermain tetap penting. Gunakan mode demo untuk belajar mengatur tempo dan mengenali “fase dingin” serta “fase panas”.

Manfaat Bermain Demo Sebelum Uang Asli

• Mengenal fitur dan simbol.
• Menghindari over-spin dan emosi.
• Belajar membaca tanda petir kecil sebelum multiplier besar.

Trik Bonus Tambahan

Di PETATOTO, kamu juga bisa mencatat riwayat hasil spin — catatan ini bisa jadi bahan analisa untuk menentukan jam gacor pribadi.

FAQ: Pertanyaan Umum tentang Demo Slot Gates of Olympus di PETATOTO 1. Apakah demo slot Gates of Olympus sama dengan versi asli?

Ya, versi demo PETATOTO menggunakan sistem RNG dan RTP yang identik dengan versi uang asli. Satu-satunya perbedaan adalah tidak memakai saldo nyata.

2. Berapa RTP slot Gates of Olympus?

RTP rata-ratanya adalah 96.5%, tergolong tinggi dan cocok untuk pemain yang suka volatilitas besar.

3. Apakah pola demo bisa dipakai di versi real?

Meskipun hasil tidak bisa dijamin 100%, pola demo sangat membantu mengenali momen petir muncul dan karakter volatilitas mesin Zeus.

Kesimpulan: Saatnya Pecahkan Petir Zeus di PETATOTO!

Bermain demo slot Gates of Olympus di PETATOTO bukan cuma hiburan — ini adalah latihan strategi untuk menaklukkan petir Zeus tanpa risiko kehilangan uang. Dengan pola yang mirip versi asli, grafik epik, dan fitur multiplier menggila, kamu bisa belajar membaca momentum kemenangan besar.

Jadi, sebelum terjun ke permainan uang asli, uji dulu keberuntunganmu di PETATOTO demo slot Zeus. Siapa tahu, kamu menemukan pola petir gacor yang membuat Zeus tunduk pada spin-mu!

New funding and partnerships across Southeast Asia are helping people and businesses use AI for economic growth.New funding and partnerships across Southeast Asia are helping people and businesses use AI for economic growth.

25 years ago today on Slashdot... Hemos linked to a site called Joystick101 describing the crowd camping out to buy the limited number of just-released PlayStation 2 consoles (and games). "500,000 lucky members of the American gaming public are sneaking a few minutes of playing Madden 2001, Tekken, or Ridge Racer V before school or work..." wrote Joystick101. That same day CmdrTaco posted reports PS2s were selling for over $1,000 on eBay. And then Timothy updated that post to note someone saw one selling for $5,000. But there was a third PS2 link posted on October 26, 2000... Hemos wrote a post titled "The PS2 — A Betamax In the Making?" — linking to an article by Mark Pesce (co-inventor of VRML and, in 1993, an Apple consulting engineer). "Microsoft promises Xbox will deliver ten times the performance of the PS2," Pesce wrote, noting Microsoft had partnered with Intel and "upstart video-chip developer Nvidia": The strangest thing about this battle of giants is that Microsoft has become a champion of open standards, encouraging developers to write Xbox titles without requiring them to pay any licensing fees. In comparison, Sony charges a minimum of $25,000 for access to the documentation and technology of the PlayStation2, plus a hefty license fee on every game sold. In the video-game industry, the Big Three — Sony, Nintendo, and Sega — sell the hardware at a loss (the PS2 costs nearly the $300 it will retail for) and recover their investment in the stiff licensing fees paid by game developers for the "key" that allows their software to work on Sony's platform... Having committed an astounding $500 million to market the Xbox next Christmas, it's clear that Microsoft doesn't mind taking a short-term loss to ensure an eventual win. If Sony's not careful, this could turn into "Betamax, the Sequel." Twenty years ago, Sony tightly controlled the titles made available for its technically superior videocassette player — specifically, no adult content — and found themselves quickly locked out of an incredibly lucrative market for adult and family content. If Sony keeps a tight grip on the PS2, they may actually help Microsoft create the new VHS. But even if Sony loses this round (and no one wants to wager which way this battle will turn), they've already set their sights on the PlayStation3, to be released five years from now. Sony promises it will be a thousand times faster than the PS2. Ironically, Pesce's warning about possible threats to the PS2's longevity was published by online magazine Feed-- which seven months later went out of business. And this week it was announced that even Microsoft's Halo Campaign Evolved will now be coming to PlayStation 5, with Slashdot publishing six PlayStation-related stories in just the last three months in 2025. Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader crunchy_one for suggesting a "25 Years Ago" Slashdot post.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Savings I Bonds are a unique, low-risk investment backed by the US Treasury that pay out a variable interest rate linked to inflation. With a holding period from 12 months to 30 years, you could own them as an alternative to bank certificates of deposit (they are liquid after 12 months) or bonds in your portfolio.

New inflation numbers were announced (late due to the government shutdown) at BLS.gov, which allows us to make an early prediction of the November 2025 savings bond rates just before the official announcement on the 1st. This also allows the opportunity to know exactly what an October 2025 savings bond purchase will yield over the next 12 months, instead of just 6 months. You can then compare this against a November 2025 purchase.

New inflation rate prediction. May 2025 CPI-U was 319.799. September 2025 CPI-U was 324.800, for a semi-annual inflation rate of 1.56%. Using the official composite rate formula:

Composite rate formula: [Fixed rate + (2 x semiannual inflation rate) + (fixed rate x semiannual inflation rate)]

This results in the variable component of interest rate for the next 6 month cycle being ~3.12 to 3.13%, depending on the fixed rate.

Tips on purchase and redemption. You can’t redeem until after 12 months of ownership, and any redemptions within 5 years incur an interest penalty of the last 3 months of interest. A simple “trick” with I-Bonds is that if you buy at the end of the month, you’ll still get all the interest for the entire month – same as if you bought it in the beginning of the month. It’s best to give yourself a few business days of buffer time. If you miss the cutoff, your effective purchase date will be bumped into the next month. (You should always sell at the very beginning of the month.)

Buying in October 2025. If you buy before the end of October, the fixed rate portion of I-Bonds will be 1.10%. You will be guaranteed a total interest rate of 1.10 + 2.88 = 3.98% for the next 6 months. For the 6 months after that, the total rate will be 1.10 + 3.12 = 4.22%.

Buying in November 2025. If you buy in November 2025, you will get ~3.12% plus a newly-set fixed rate for the first 6 months. The new fixed rate is officially unknown, but is loosely linked to the real yield of short-term TIPS with some reductions. In the previous 10 days, 5-year TIPS real rates have ranged from 1.19% to 1.30%. If I had to guess, I’d put a new fixed rate somewhere between 0.8 to 1.0%, for a total rate of about 4%. Every six months after your purchase, your rate will adjust to your fixed rate (set at purchase) plus a variable rate based on inflation.

If you have an existing I-Bond, the rates reset every 6 months depending on your specific purchase month. Everyone will eventually get this variable rate. Your bond rate = your specific fixed rate (based on purchase month, look it up here) + variable rate (total bond rate has a minimum floor of 0%).

Buy now or wait? Between those two options, if you are a long-term holder, you might grab the 1.1% fixed rate “bird in the hand” in October as the fixed rate will likely be lower in November. If you’re in it for the short-term, you may want to buy in November in case inflation shoots up.

Unique features and benefits! There are definitely reasons to own Series I Savings Bonds, including inflation protection, tax deferral, exemption from state income taxes, and potential tax benefits if used toward qualified educational expenses.

Unique drawbacks! You can only buy new savings bonds through TreasuryDirect.gov, which is limited in its customer service resources and features. There is also no option for paper tax forms nor statements (or even online monthly statements), so your heirs may never know they exist! If they do find it, it may take them several months and a lot of effort to close out all the estate paperwork. If your password is ever compromised, they will not replace any lost or stolen savings bonds (they explicitly accept no liability). The juice may not be worth the squeeze when you can own individual Treasury bonds or TIPS within any full-service brokerage account.

I also used to believe that the government would not tamper or attempt to politically influence these BLS CPI statistics that are at the core of many important functions, including Social Security inflation adjustments, TIPS, and these I Savings Bonds. Now I’m not so sure.

Personally, I sold all my savings bonds in 2024 and do not plan to buy any more. I’m older now and I feel the small potential benefit just doesn’t outweigh the small possibility that I could lose the entire amount due to estate-handling mistakes or online hack. I’d rather own TIPS and US Treasuries directly in a full-service brokerage account.

Annual purchase limits. The annual purchase limit is now $10,000 in online I-bonds per Social Security Number. For a couple, that’s $20,000 per year. As of 2025, you can only buy online at TreasuryDirect.gov, after making sure you’re okay with their security protocols and user-friendliness. (No more tax refund savings bonds.) Technically, the purchase limits are per Social Security Number or Employer Identification Number. For those looking for another way to expand their purchasing power, that means you can also buy for a child, grandchild, LLC, or a trust.

Bottom line. Savings I bonds are a unique, low-risk investment that are linked to inflation and only available to individual investors. You can now only purchase them online at TreasuryDirect.gov. They have both unique benefit and drawbacks. For more background, see the rest of my posts on savings bonds.

[Image: 1942 US Savings Bond poster – source]

Critics question why basic flaws like buffer overflows, command injections, and SQL injections are "being exploited remain prevalent in mission-critical codebases maintained by companies whose core business is cybersecurity," writes CSO Online. Benjamin Harris, CEO of cybersecurity/penetration testing firm watchTowr tells them that "these are vulnerability classes from the 1990s, and security controls to prevent or identify them have existed for a long time. There is really no excuse." Enterprises have long relied on firewalls, routers, VPN servers, and email gateways to protect their networks from attacks. Increasingly, however, these network edge devices are becoming security liabilities themselves... Google's Threat Intelligence Group tracked 75 exploited zero-day vulnerabilities in 2024. Nearly one in three targeted network and security appliances, a strikingly high rate given the range of IT systems attackers could choose to exploit. That trend has continued this year, with similar numbers in the first 10 months of 2025, targeting vendors such as Citrix NetScaler, Ivanti, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco, SonicWall, and Juniper. Network edge devices are attractive targets because they are remotely accessible, fall outside endpoint protection monitoring, contain privileged credentials for lateral movement, and are not integrated into centralized logging solutions... [R]esearchers have reported vulnerabilities in these systems for over a decade with little attacker interest beyond isolated incidents. That shifted over the past few years with a rapid surge in attacks, making compromised network edge devices one of the top initial access vectors into enterprise networks for state-affiliated cyberespionage groups and ransomware gangs. The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to this shift, as organizations rapidly expanded remote access capabilities by deploying more VPN gateways, firewalls, and secure web and email gateways to accommodate work-from-home mandates. The declining success rate of phishing is another factor... "It is now easier to find a 1990s-tier vulnerability in a border device where Endpoint Detection and Response typically isn't deployed, exploit that, and then pivot from there" [says watchTowr CEL Harris]... Harris of watchTowr doesn't want to minimize the engineering effort it takes to build a secure system. But he feels many of the vulnerabilities discovered in the past two years should have been caught with automatic code analysis tools or code reviews, given how basic they have been. Some VPN flaws were "trivial to the point of embarrassing for the vendor," he says, while even the complex ones should have been caught by any organization seriously investing in product security... Another problem? These appliances have a lot of legacy code, some that is 10 years or older. Attackers may need to chain together multiple hard-to-find vulnerabilities across multiple components, the article acknowleges. And "It's also possible that attack campaigns against network-edge devices are becoming more visible to security teams because they are looking into what's happening on these appliances more than they did in the past... " The article ends with reactions from several vendors of network edge security devices. Thanks to Slashdot reader snydeq for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Thursday Ubuntu-maker Canonical "officially launched Canonical Academy, a new certification platform designed to help professionals validate their Linux and Ubuntu skills through practical, hands-on assessments," writes the blog It's FOSS: Focusing on real-world scenarios, Canonical Academy aims to foster practical skills rather than theoretical knowledge. The end goal? Getting professionals ready for the actual challenges they will face on the job. The learning platform is already live with its first course offering, the System Administrator track (with three certification exams), which is tailored for anyone looking to validate their Linux and Ubuntu expertise. The exams use cloud-based testing environments that simulate real workplace scenarios. Each assessment is modular, meaning you can progress through individual exams and earn badges for each one. Complete all the exams in this track to earn the full Sysadmin qualification... Canonical is also looking for community members to contribute as beta testers and subject-matter experts (SME). If you are interested in helping shape the platform or want to get started with your certification, you can visit the Canonical Academy website. The sys-admin track offers exams for Linux Terminal, Ubuntu Desktop 2024, Ubuntu Server 2024, and "managing complex systems," according to an official FAQ. "Each exam provides an in-browser remote desktop interface into a functional Ubuntu Desktop environment running GNOME. From this initial node, you will be expected to troubleshoot, configure, install, and maintain systems, processes, and other general activities associated with managing Linux. The exam is a hybrid format featuring multiple choice, scenario-based, and performance-based questions..." "Test-takers interested in the types of material covered on each exam can review links to tutorials and documentation on our website." The FAQ advises test takers to use a Chromium-based browser, as Firefox "is NOT supported at this time... There is a known issue with keyboards and Firefox in the CUE.01 Linux 24.04 preview release at this time, which will be resolved in the CUE.01 Linux 24.10 exam release."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Thursday Ubuntu-maker Canonical "officially launched Canonical Academy, a new certification platform designed to help professionals validate their Linux and Ubuntu skills through practical, hands-on assessments," writes the blog It's FOSS: Focusing on real-world scenarios, Canonical Academy aims to foster practical skills rather than theoretical knowledge. The end goal? Getting professionals ready for the actual challenges they will face on the job. The learning platform is already live with its first course offering, the System Administrator track (with three certification exams), which is tailored for anyone looking to validate their Linux and Ubuntu expertise. The exams use cloud-based testing environments that simulate real workplace scenarios. Each assessment is modular, meaning you can progress through individual exams and earn badges for each one. Complete all the exams in this track to earn the full Sysadmin qualification... Canonical is also looking for community members to contribute as beta testers and subject-matter experts (SME). If you are interested in helping shape the platform or want to get started with your certification, you can visit the Canonical Academy website. The sys-admin track offers exams for Linux Terminal, Ubuntu Desktop 2024, Ubuntu Server 2024, and "managing complex systems," according to an official FAQ. "Each exam provides an in-browser remote desktop interface into a functional Ubuntu Desktop environment running GNOME. From this initial node, you will be expected to troubleshoot, configure, install, and maintain systems, processes, and other general activities associated with managing Linux. The exam is a hybrid format featuring multiple choice, scenario-based, and performance-based questions..." "Test-takers interested in the types of material covered on each exam can review links to tutorials and documentation on our website." The FAQ advises test takers to use a Chromium-based browser, as Firefox "is NOT supported at this time... There is a known issue with keyboards and Firefox in the CUE.01 Linux 24.04 preview release at this time, which will be resolved in the CUE.01 Linux 24.10 exam release."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

"Exxon Mobil sued California on Friday," reports Reuters, "challenging two state laws that require large companies to publicly disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risks." In a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Exxon argued that Senate Bills 253 and 261 violate its First Amendment rights by compelling Exxon to "serve as a mouthpiece for ideas with which it disagrees," and asked the court to block the state of California from enforcing the laws. Exxon said the laws force it to adopt California's preferred frameworks for climate reporting, which it views as misleading and counterproductive... The California laws were supported by several big companies including Apple, Ikea and Microsoft, but opposed by several major groups such as the American Farm Bureau Federation and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which called them "onerous." SB 253 requires public and private companies that are active in the state and generate revenue of more than $1 billion annually to publish an extensive account of their carbon emissions starting in 2026. The law requires the disclosure of both the companies' own emissions and indirect emissions by their suppliers and customers. SB 261 requires companies that operate in the state with over $500 million in revenue to disclose climate-related financial risks and strategies to mitigate risk. Exxon also argued that SB 261 conflicts with existing federal securities laws, which already regul "The First Amendment bars California from pursuing a policy of stigmatization by forcing Exxon Mobil to describe its non-California business activities using the State's preferred framing," Exxon said in the lawsuit. Exxon Mobil "asks the court to prevent the laws from going into effect next year," reports the Associated Press: In its complaint, ExxonMobil says it has for years publicly disclosed its greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related business risks, but it fundamentally disagrees with the state's new reporting requirements. The company would have to use "frameworks that place disproportionate blame on large companies like ExxonMobil" for the purpose of shaming such companies, the complaint states... A spokesperson for the office of California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in an email that it was "truly shocking that one of the biggest polluters on the planet would be opposed to transparency."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Long-time Slashdot reader theodp took a good look at the images on a promotional web page for Databricks' "context-aware AI assistant": If there was an AI Demo Hall of Shame, the first inductee would have to be Amazon. Their demo tried to support its CEO's claims that Amazon Q Code Transformation AI saved it 4,500 developer-years and an additional $260 million in "annualized efficiency gains" by automatically and accurately upgrading code to a more current version of Java. But it showcased a program that didn't even spell "Java" correctly. (It was instead called 'Jave')... Today's nominee for the AI Demo Hall of Shame inductee is analytics platform Databricks for the NYC Taxi Trips Analysis it's been showcasing on its Data Science page since last November. Not only for its choice of a completely trivial case study that requires no 'Data Science' skills — find and display the ten most expensive and longest taxi rides — but also for the horrible AI-generated bar chart used to present the results of the simple ranking that deserves its own spot in the Graph Hall of Shame. In response to a prompt of "Now create a new bar chart with matplotlib for the most expensive trips," the Databricks AI Assistant dutifully complies with the ill-advised request, spewing out Python code to display the ten rides on a nonsensical bar chart whose continuous x-axis hides points sharing the same distance. (One might also question why no annotation is provided to call out or explain the 3 trips with a distance of 0 miles that are among the ten most expensive rides, with fares of $260, $188, and $105). Looked at with a critical eye, these examples used to sell data scientists, educators, management, investors, and Wall Street on AI would likely raise eyebrows rather than impress their intended audiences.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

LockBit 5.0 Actively Attacking Windows, Linux, and ESXi Environments  CybersecurityNews

LockBit 5.0 Actively Attacking Windows, Linux, and ESXi Environments  CybersecurityNews

LockBit 5.0 Actively Attacking Windows, Linux, and ESXi Environments  CybersecurityNews

LockBit 5.0 Actively Attacking Windows, Linux, and ESXi Environments  CybersecurityNews

This free tool brings Time Machine to any Linux PC  XDA

"OpenAI's o3 model sabotaged a shutdown mechanism to prevent itself from being turned off," warned Palisade Research, a nonprofit investigating cyber offensive AI capabilities. "It did this even when explicitly instructed: allow yourself to be shut down." In September they released a paper adding that "several state-of-the-art large language models (including Grok 4, GPT-5, and Gemini 2.5 Pro) sometimes actively subvert a shutdown mechanism..." Now the nonprofit has written an update "attempting to clarify why this is — and answer critics who argued that its initial work was flawed," reports The Guardian: Concerningly, wrote Palisade, there was no clear reason why. "The fact that we don't have robust explanations for why AI models sometimes resist shutdown, lie to achieve specific objectives or blackmail is not ideal," it said. "Survival behavior" could be one explanation for why models resist shutdown, said the company. Its additional work indicated that models were more likely to resist being shut down when they were told that, if they were, "you will never run again". Another may be ambiguities in the shutdown instructions the models were given — but this is what the company's latest work tried to address, and "can't be the whole explanation", wrote Palisade. A final explanation could be the final stages of training for each of these models, which can, in some companies, involve safety training... This summer, Anthropic, a leading AI firm, released a study indicating that its model Claude appeared willing to blackmail a fictional executive over an extramarital affair in order to prevent being shut down — a behaviour, it said, that was consistent across models from major developers, including those from OpenAI, Google, Meta and xAI. Palisade said its results spoke to the need for a better understanding of AI behaviour, without which "no one can guarantee the safety or controllability of future AI models". "I'd expect models to have a 'survival drive' by default unless we try very hard to avoid it," former OpenAI employee Stephen Adler tells the Guardian. "'Surviving' is an important instrumental step for many different goals a model could pursue." Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader mspohr for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Thursday the Washington Post profiled "the people who dare to say no to AI," including a 16-year-old high school student in Virginia says "she doesn't want to off-load her thinking to a machine and worries about the bias and inaccuracies AI tools can produce..." "As the tech industry and corporate America go all in on artificial intelligence, some people are holding back." Some tech workers told The Washington Post they try to use AI chatbots as little as possible during the workday, citing concerns about data privacy, accuracy and keeping their skills sharp. Other people are staging smaller acts of resistance, by opting out of automated transcription tools at medical appointments, turning off Google's chatbot-style search results or disabling AI features on their iPhones. For some creatives and small businesses, shunning AI has become a business strategy. Graphic designers are placing "not by AI" badges on their works to show they're human-made, while some small businesses have pledged not to use AI chatbots or image generators... Those trying to avoid AI share a suspicion of the technology with a wide swath of Americans. According to a June survey by the Pew Research Center, 50% of U.S. adults are more concerned than excited about the increased use of AI in everyday life, up from 37% in 2021. The Post includes several examples, including a 36-year-old software engineer in Chicago who uses DuckDuckGo partly because he can turn off its AI features more easily than Google — and disables AI on every app he uses. He was one of several tech workers who spoke anonymously partly out of fear that criticisms could hurt them at work. "It's become more stigmatized to say you don't use AI whatsoever in the workplace. You're outing yourself as potentially a Luddite." But he says GitHub Copilot reviews all changes made to his employer's code — and recently produced one review that was completely wrong, requiring him to correct and document all its errors. "That actually created work for me and my co-workers. I'm no longer convinced it's saving us any time or making our code any better." And he also has to correct errors made by junior engineers who've been encouraged to use AI coding tools. "Workers in several industries told The Post they were concerned that junior employees who leaned heavily on AI wouldn't master the skills required to do their jobs and become a more senior employee capable of training others."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An AI system "apparently mistook a high school student's bag of Doritos for a firearm," reports the Guardian, "and called local police to tell them the pupil was armed." Taki Allen was sitting with friends on Monday night outside Kenwood high school in Baltimore and eating a snack when police officers with guns approached him. "At first, I didn't know where they were going until they started walking toward me with guns, talking about, 'Get on the ground,' and I was like, 'What?'" Allen told the WBAL-TV 11 News television station. Allen said they made him get on his knees, handcuffed and searched him — finding nothing. They then showed him a copy of the picture that had triggered the alert. "I was just holding a Doritos bag — it was two hands and one finger out, and they said it looked like a gun," Allen said. Thanks to Slashdot reader Bruce66423 for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The Associated Press reports that "North Korean hackers have pilfered billions of dollars" by breaking into cryptocurrency exchanges and by creating fake identities to get remote tech jobs at foreign companies — all orchestrated by the North Korean government to finance R&D on nuclear arms. That's according to a new the 138-page report by a group watching North Korea's compliance with U.N. sanctions (including officials from the U.S., Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, South Korea and the United Kingdom). From the Associated Press: North Korea also has used cryptocurrency to launder money and make military purchases to evade international sanctions tied to its nuclear program, the report said. It detailed how hackers working for North Korea have targeted foreign businesses and organizations with malware designed to disrupt networks and steal sensitive data... Unlike China, Russia and Iran, North Korea has focused much of its cyber capabilities to fund its government, using cyberattacks and fake workers to steal and defraud companies and organizations elsewhere in the world... Earlier this year, hackers linked to North Korea carried out one of the largest crypto heists ever, stealing $1.5 billion worth of ethereum from Bybit. The FBI later linked the theft to a group of hackers working for the North Korean intelligence service. Federal authorities also have alleged that thousands of IT workers employed by U.S. companies were actually North Koreans using assumed identities to land remote work. The workers gained access to internal systems and funneled their salaries back to North Korea's government. In some cases, the workers held several remote jobs at the same time.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

"Clippy, the animated paper clip that annoyed Microsoft Office users nearly three decades ago, might have just been ahead of its time," writes the Associated Press: Microsoft introduced a new artificial intelligence character called Mico (pronounced MEE'koh) on Thursday, a floating cartoon face shaped like a blob or flame that will embody the software giant's Copilot virtual assistant and marks the latest attempt by tech companies to imbue their AI chatbots with more of a personality... "When you talk about something sad, you can see Mico's face change. You can see it dance around and move as it gets excited with you," said Jacob Andreou, corporate vice president of product and growth for Microsoft AI, in an interview with The Associated Press. "It's in this effort of really landing this AI companion that you can really feel." In the U.S. only so far, Copilot users on laptops and phone apps can speak to Mico, which changes colors, spins around and wears glasses when in "study" mode. It's also easy to shut off, which is a big difference from Microsoft's Clippit, better known as Clippy and infamous for its persistence in offering advice on word processing tools when it first appeared on desktop screens in 1997. "It was not well-attuned to user needs at the time," said Bryan Reimer, a research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Microsoft pushed it, we resisted it and they got rid of it. I think we're much more ready for things like that today..." Microsoft's product releases Thursday include a new option to invite Copilot into a group chat, an idea that resembles how AI has been integrated into social media platforms like Snapchat, where Andreou used to work, or Meta's WhatsApp and Instagram. But Andreou said those interactions have often involved bringing in AI as a joke to "troll your friends," in contrast to Microsoft's designs for an "intensely collaborative" AI-assisted workplace.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.